Software testing is a crucial part in developing projects. Through this process information related to the quality of the software developed is evaluated by the programmer or developer. With rising competition it seems fair to launch the product before your competitors and fix the bugs later. It does sound appealing but this would not ensure success for your product. Rather comprehending the features of your product is more important in the daily activities and eventually, in the success of any business. Continue reading The Importance Of Software Testing For IT Businesses
ISTQB or International Software Testing Qualifications Board is an internationally acclaimed organization, which provides certification of software testing qualification that is accepted by companies all over the world. ISTQB certification is the standard qualification for the S/W testers that is based on a particular syllabus and comes in the form of a definite hierarchy along with some accreditation as well as examination guidelines.
A majority of the modern companies nowadays hires software evaluators who are ISTQB certified because of the fact that there are certain added advantages of hiring these professionals. A lot of S/W companies as well as enterprise IT departments nowadays looks for trusted partners who are capable of offering complete testing solutions by utilizing the best working resources. This is why they are opting for ISTQB certified testers. Let us discuss the advantages one by one.
These professionals help reduce the defects of the software development
As per market research, it is revealed that a synergistic amalgamation of prevention of defects, pre-test removal of defects, as well as a formal evaluation of the S/W packages by ISTQB certified professionals can help the companies reach almost 99 percent efficiency in terms of defect detection along with fixing, backed by significant reduction of costs and shortening of development schedules.
Significant reduction of development of cost
These testers help companies to qualify for various low cost, yet value added insurance packages and that understandably benefits modern companies by resulting in a significant amount of cost savings in the long run.
These personnel help in faster delivery of packages
The test managers of the companies are of the opinion that use of ISTQB certified pool of software testing knowledge leads to a much better as well as faster communication along with a greater efficiency among as well as, across the development teams.
Provides an international or global tinge to the companies
ISTQB S/W testing certification is the effectual global standard of expertise that is accepted all over the world. Naturally, hiring certified professionals provide the companies a global flavor that is too strong to be ignored.
These certified personnel are budget-friendly
The certification of International Software Testing Qualifications Board does not involve any expansive course. That is the reason any employee can undergo these courses by self-studying, and use in-house trainers and utilize ASTQB accredited education without shelling out too much expense and without hampering the daily works.
It gives the employees enough flexibility to choose the education
The testers, once ISTQB certified are able to choose their syllabus as well as examination topics. They can use self-study methods and hence become too much flexible. This provides them a lot of impetus so far as performance is concerned and this naturally has a positive impact on the overall performance of the company, so far as the quality of work is concerned.
Hence, in a nutshell, hiring software evaluation professionals having this qualification have a lot of advantages that can be summarized in the following ways.
Having a string of certified staff provides a lot of competitive edge to the companies. Besides, this competitive edge helps these organizations to immensely benefit from adoption of structured as well as streamlined practicing methods of software testing along with optimization of testing activities.
Companies that hire ISTQB certification accredited staff have the benefit of providing high end services to the customers, thereby increasing the revenue and their brand value. Moreover, adoption of various schemes of ISTQB helps a particular organization, in remaining up to date with various software testing innovations. Besides, formal global recognition of the business organizations who have adopted the certification becomes much easier.
The reason behind global accreditation of ISTQB Foundation is also due to the fact that it demonstrates much higher extent of expertise, professional sharpness, along personal ambition of the software testers. Thus, the S/W professionals who have this particular certification to their credit have a significant advantage over the non-certified counterparts, particularly when it comes to being hired by various frontline software development companies.
You can hire testers from top web application testing companies in India who can help you accomplish testing within allocated budgets and time schedules.
Before we discuss the importance of Manual Testing, at first let us know what actually it is. It is actually a process that is followed to detect and pick up errors as well as flaws within a particular software application. Since the detection is done manually, the individual who tests the application plays the most important role as an end user when it comes to verifying as well as evaluating the features or the behavior of the application in question under various circumstances. Though it is the preliminary stage of assessment, it is needed to be executed in a seamless way before switching over to automated testing.
The principal objective of non-automatic evaluation is guaranteeing that the application that is subjected to test is free of glitches as well as defects and is working perfectly as per the specification of the requirements. Now let us see how important this type of software evaluation these days really is.
At present, even as the concept of automatic testing is fast gaining momentum in terms of popularity, this has not rendered the concept of manual evaluation totally useless. In fact, prior to starting the automatic assessment of a software application, there is an ardent need of setting up a base that will decide when and how to start the automatic evaluation. It is manual testing that forms that base and here lies its importance. This form of software evaluation helps to understand the reason behind testing, the role of quality as well as its reliability and the risks that are involved in the evaluation. Besides, it also helps in a better understanding of the risks that are associated. It also helps improving the testability through evaluation of the risk factors.
Although, there are a lot advantages that are associated with automated evaluation of software applications, the manual version has still not lost its importance and relevance whatsoever. In fact, there are certain instances where the manual variety is more important than the automatic variety. There are a number of software packages in the market, which are released successfully after solely depending upon manual testing without any type of automatic assessment whatsoever.
However, experts are of the opinion that the best way to evaluate a software application is by setting up a perfect combination of manual and automated testing and this makes manual evaluation so important in today’s context. Though you will find a lot of discussions regarding the efficacy or importance of automated discussion, there are certain cases where the manual version is more effective as well as more important than the automatic one. A perfect combination of the two varieties would provide you an error free software application with no regression bugs and this will allow you to give more thrust towards further development and enhancement of the application in question. In fact, there are certain bugs that can be detected only with the successful manual software testing.
The basic issue of non-automated testing is to know how to use each and every technique for solving various problems. Frankly speaking, when it comes to assessing whether a particular application can be used by human, the best answer is non-automated evaluation. This is because in most of the cases, automatic assessment is not able to decide whether the text or the information provided can be apprehended by the end user and here is where the importance of manual assessment comes into play. Even if there is an automatic process to do so that will be expensive. Hence, the popular notion is that, though it can well be automated, it is more feasible to manually test those effects, as this will very much provide more confidence to the users as well as much cheaper in terms of time that is taken.
You can hire testers from top offshore software testing companies in India who can help you accomplish testing within allocated budgets and time schedules.
Software testing has of late become an absolutely indispensable criterion so far as progress of companies is concerned. This is one activity that no company can ignore as that will have a disastrous impact on their progress and goodwill in the market, especially taking into account the cutthroat competition that is prevailing.
Now let us look into, why it becomes difficult for the companies to survive without software testing. In the present day business scenario, when each and every customer would like to pay only for picture perfect products, SW evaluation is an absolute necessity. Today’s customers need the products to be implemented as well as installed faster in order to have an edge over their competitors and this is where the real challenge lies. Successful implementation of key as well as value added features within a short period of time and on time delivery of SW to the clients are the keys to the progress of a company. This is only possible if the software is properly tested by trained professionals for a considerable period of time before the delivery. After all, who would like to accept defective software and work with the same? Hence, a thorough SW evaluation is the first and foremost condition of a product’s success, which in turn helps the business to thrive from the clients’ point of view as well as that of the developer’s.
Again, one should keep in mind that software development is a continuous process. A good company would always continuously come up with newer versions of software it has developed. Hence, it needs to maintain a tight schedule to meet deadlines. Therefore, there is a continuous shortage of time which needs to be countered while releasing newer software versions. At times, these tight schedules are reasons enough for bugs to pile up on software products. It is here where the need for evaluation or debugging arises.
Usually, evaluation is considered as one of the phases in the lifecycle of SW systems. However, one school of thought suggests that there is need of these tests in every phase of a product. Therefore, how can a company do without these evaluation processes?
In fact, in SDLC or Software Development Life Cycle, evaluation plays an extremely crucial role that helps in the improvement of performance, quality, as well as the reliability of the software in question.
The main objective behind SW evaluation is to reduce the risks that are associated with SW development. When we speak about risks, they are both technical as well as programmatic, i.e. the risk of the software not performing as intended or getting too complicated or difficult to operate or modify, maintain or browse. All these are taken care of during examining the functionality of the SW. Naturally, software testing would definitely help a company to live up to the goodwill and reputation that it has built over the years.
Most importantly, once a certain benchmark is set, that needs to be met and even crossed during subsequent period of time by a company and it is the practice of SW evaluation that helps the company in question in that.
Now surely a business can avoid the practice of SW evaluation. However, it will be an extremely risky affair for it, especially in its efforts to meet customer satisfaction. It can well fail to meet the customer requirement in terms of customization as well as quality and if that happens, that will be a huge blow to its goodwill. That is why, each and every business would like to be dead sure as well as confident about the quality of the product they are offering to their clients. Hence, there should be no prize for guessing, that no business would thrive without the contribution of SW testing.
You can hire software testing company in India who can help you accomplish testing within allocated budgets and time schedules.
As the push for infusing information technology into the healthcare space continues, each year is expected to have its own share of activities and initiatives which get implemented. All of these are finally expected to synergize and lead to a highly efficient and cost effective healthcare system in the future. Each such initiative has a starting time keeping in mind the change it is expected to bring about and the contribution it would make to the system over time. Also, all such initiatives are expected to have certain gestations periods to start offering real benefits. However, the build-up years are bound to result in certain levels of uncertainty and heartburn amongst all concerned stakeholders – owing to major changes affecting the status quo at any point in time.
Year 2013 saw some such Health IT initiatives getting implemented. A few of those were in response to concerns arising on the way and a few with the foresight of where the industry wants to reach. The important wants are as follows:
The HIPAA Omnibus Rule:
As an expansion to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountable Act, four new rules have been implemented. Contractors, subcontractors and other business associates of healthcare entities who deal with patient data are now expected to protect it as otherwise a provider would. There are penalties in place as well for cases of non-compliance. Also, how patient information is to be used for marketing purposes and for raising funds have defined guidelines to follow no. In short, no patient information can be sold without the required permission in place. With the digital world in a perennial expansion mode, the new rule is expected to protect patient privacy and safeguard patient health information.
Guidance for Mobile Medical Application:
This was provided by the Food and Drug Administration after an almost 2-year wait. The guidelines are enforced only on a certain percentage of apps which pose a threat to patients if they fail to perform what they intend to. Thus, only a small subset of the overall app market falls under its purview. In its current state, the oversight is on all those mobile medical applications which are aimed at being used as accessories to regulated mobile devices or which are likely to transform mobile platforms into regulated medical devices. The agency has been very particular to apply those regulatory standards which it otherwise applies to medical devices. This clarity is also very relevant to the developer community as they build newer and more effective solutions. There were some omissions in the guidelines which include:
- definition of what are regulated i.e. how to determine what requires regulation and what necessitates enforcement discretion
- defining the levels of risk for mobile devices & their accessories
- disease intended uses compared to unregulated, wellness intended uses
- exact meaning of an accessory to a medical device
Meaningful Use Stage 2 deadline extension:
Senators may have asked for a reboot of the system, some senior leaders might have questioned its true benefits; MU is here to stay. However, there is widespread consensus on some of the issues which stand as hurdles in its implementation – with the major one concerning the timeline. As a response to this, CMS proposed Meaningful Stage 2 implementation to be extended through 2016. This will result in the roll out of stage 3 getting pushed to 2017. There has however not been a shift in the start date resulting in drawing flak from some CIOs. They are not convinced about the intent of such a move – that of allowing time for fine tuning for the next stage by extending the deadline and not bring in flexibility in the start date which seems to be the need of the hour. Effectively, it means that those providers who do not start on time will miss out on a payment cycle.
Use of Big Data:
It might be early days for big data usage in healthcare systems; providers who have started using them for their clinical and administrative work have already started noticing the benefits. From reducing mortality rates, bringing down instances of readmission to performing evidence-based budgeting, there are predictions already of saving close to $450 billion in healthcare costs if the right usage of big data is made. People from some sections of the industry are however not overtly excited in jumping to such conclusions although they acknowledge the positives which are visible.
What will be new in 2014? Healthcare testing services would be in demand. Because of the large number of initiatives being rolled out and newer changes affecting healthcare, testing would peak during the year. Certified testing team would help you stay in line with your business goals while ensuring delivery of accurate healthcare solutions.
With the ever increasing innovations in the world of automated testing tools, a large number of organizations make the best possible choice, attempting to make the tools suitable for functioning in their environment. This article outlines the major challenges that are most often seen in organizations that struggle to make effectual automated testing a reality. The earlier these challenges are detected, the better prepared a company will be for the purpose of dealing with them.
Top Ten Challenges of Automated Testing and Solution Strategies
These challenging issues are presented from the least to the highest effect on the overall test automation system.
1. Purchasing the wrong tool
- Take time before defining the tool requirements in terms of applications, people skills, technology, process and organization.
- Involve potential users in order to define evaluation criteria as well as tool requirements.
- Build an evaluation scorecard for comparing the tools’ performance against a set of common criteria.
- Perform a POC (proof of concept) as opposed to an assessment.
2. Incompetent test team organization
- In the testing team involve a test scriptor who is comfortable to work with code and capable of taking the basic testing which has been developed by a testing analyst.
- The person should also have the knowledge of converting it into an automated script.
- With basic scripting concepts initially start simply to add complexity later.
3. Lack of support management
- Communicate that it takes planning and time to build a steady foundation of the right tools, processes and people.
- Present the challenges along with the benefits while making the case to management for acquiring testing tools.
- Reinforce management for carrying a good amount of influence in the way people are going to accept automated testing tools.
- Keep the management informed about tool progress and other related issues that arise.
4. Incomplete test type coverage
- When evaluating tools, prioritize what types of evaluation are the most challenging to your success. Then evaluate the candidate tools on those criteria.
- Understand the tools as well as their tradeoffs. In order to get higher levels of type coverage of test, you may need to utilize a multiple tool solution. For example, you may need to combine the playback or capture tool along with a load test tool for the purpose of covering your performance test cases.
- Remind people that 100% test type coverage cannot be possible. However, after having 80% of the automation tests, you can manually deal with the rest.
5. Incompetent tool training
- In the tool proposal include money for the purpose of training at least a core section of people.
- Choose the most applicable topics for training to match people.
- Organize tool training performed by a vendor at your location to use your own application as exercise.
- For 3 or 4 weeks, get a skilled consultant who is experienced in tool training.
6. Lack of acceptance and tool ownership
- You are recommended not to cut the tool training. Training never guarantees success, but you may be at risk of technological abandonment without it.
- In your organization, include someone for the job of a tool smith. This person will be the resident expert on the testing tools.
- It takes the management to emphasize on the tool effort and usage is an essential part required for the testing process.
7. Lack of a basic understanding of test process or what to test
Create a list of evaluation criteria for functionality that you are looking forward to considering while using the automated testing tool. These criteria include:
- Repeatability of tests
- Risk or complexity of applications
- Ease of automation
- Simplicity of operation
- Level of documentation of the functional requirements.
- Analyze your existing set of test scripts and cases to see which ones are most applicable.
- Examine your latest testing procedure and find out where it needs to be adjusted for applying automated testing tools.
- Try and make changes in the latest ways you execute tests.
- Involve professionals who will be using the tool for the purpose of helping in designing the automated testing method.
8. Lack of management processes of configuration
- Consider the people as well as processes that are required to manage the test scripts or automated testing.
- Look for tools which accommodate changes gracefully to the user interface.
- Trace automated test scripts as part of the configuration set of an application.
- Include the potential automation test SCM person in evaluating testing tools and their respective offerings of test management.
9. Lack of tool interoperability and compatibility
- Select tools having cross-platform capability as much as possible.
- Consider writing bridging scripts, as well as shell scripts possibly in non-proprietary scripting languages like Tcl.
- Critically evaluate whether the ability of performing cross-platform testing is a strong requirement.
10. Lack of tool accessibility
- If obtaining a quality technical fit is an issue, find information regarding lesser-known testing tools by networking with other testers.
- Try and find tools that is going to work between platforms.
- Use free or low priced tools in order to investigate the possibilities of building your own testing tools.
It is important to understand that even the organizations that have developed core competencies in dealing with test automation also struggle with these challenges at times. Although, herein the challenges are only focused, there are a number of benefits that can be accomplished from test automation. Tools are a part of an efficient test approach, but not the overall approach. A workable process executed by motivated and trained staff is needed in a controlled environment. Successful software automation tests are possible if the basic issues are managed and addressed.
You can hire testers from top QA software testing companies in India who can help you accomplish testing within allocated budgets and time schedules.