Before we discuss the importance of Manual Testing, at first let us know what actually it is. It is actually a process that is followed to detect and pick up errors as well as flaws within a particular software application. Since the detection is done manually, the individual who tests the application plays the most important role as an end user when it comes to verifying as well as evaluating the features or the behavior of the application in question under various circumstances. Though it is the preliminary stage of assessment, it is needed to be executed in a seamless way before switching over to automated testing.
The principal objective of non-automatic evaluation is guaranteeing that the application that is subjected to test is free of glitches as well as defects and is working perfectly as per the specification of the requirements. Now let us see how important this type of software evaluation these days really is.
At present, even as the concept of automatic testing is fast gaining momentum in terms of popularity, this has not rendered the concept of manual evaluation totally useless. In fact, prior to starting the automatic assessment of a software application, there is an ardent need of setting up a base that will decide when and how to start the automatic evaluation. It is manual testing that forms that base and here lies its importance. This form of software evaluation helps to understand the reason behind testing, the role of quality as well as its reliability and the risks that are involved in the evaluation. Besides, it also helps in a better understanding of the risks that are associated. It also helps improving the testability through evaluation of the risk factors.
Although, there are a lot advantages that are associated with automated evaluation of software applications, the manual version has still not lost its importance and relevance whatsoever. In fact, there are certain instances where the manual variety is more important than the automatic variety. There are a number of software packages in the market, which are released successfully after solely depending upon manual testing without any type of automatic assessment whatsoever.
However, experts are of the opinion that the best way to evaluate a software application is by setting up a perfect combination of manual and automated testing and this makes manual evaluation so important in today’s context. Though you will find a lot of discussions regarding the efficacy or importance of automated discussion, there are certain cases where the manual version is more effective as well as more important than the automatic one. A perfect combination of the two varieties would provide you an error free software application with no regression bugs and this will allow you to give more thrust towards further development and enhancement of the application in question. In fact, there are certain bugs that can be detected only with the successful manual software testing.
The basic issue of non-automated testing is to know how to use each and every technique for solving various problems. Frankly speaking, when it comes to assessing whether a particular application can be used by human, the best answer is non-automated evaluation. This is because in most of the cases, automatic assessment is not able to decide whether the text or the information provided can be apprehended by the end user and here is where the importance of manual assessment comes into play. Even if there is an automatic process to do so that will be expensive. Hence, the popular notion is that, though it can well be automated, it is more feasible to manually test those effects, as this will very much provide more confidence to the users as well as much cheaper in terms of time that is taken.
You can hire testers from top offshore software testing companies in India who can help you accomplish testing within allocated budgets and time schedules.